The trouble when I convert the files is that InDesign converts the Code style's straight quotes to curly.
Each page in the P65 files contain a 'Body' style using typographer (curly) quotes and a 'Code' style using straight quotes. I need to convert some Pagemaker P65 files to InDesign format. See more: identicle conversion pdf word, file upload conversion pdf aspnet, pdf dst file conversion, p65 to pdf converter online, pm file to pdf, pmd file to word converter online, pmd to pdf online, pdf to word converter, pagemaker 6. Problem Converting Pagemaker files to Indesign CS. Skills: PDF, Graphic Design, Adobe Pagemaker, Adobe InDesign John McRae, Indiana University (but about to move to Japan.I need pdf files conversion into pagemaker file. Or, is there a doc somewhere I haven't seen? I would deeply appreciate suggestions on how to make the conversion process less painful! In particular, it would be nice to get some help from Adobe, which puts out all sorts of material on converting from Quark and PageMaker, but nothing on conversion from FrameMaker. Note that I cannot get the Mac version of FrameMaker to make anything useful for me - the RTF and XML "save as" options fail in different ways. However, the mixed diacritical Latin + Chinese + Japanese text comes through OK. The footnotes are placed in the files as text, and sometimes mysterious "objects" in the files block the PDF generation. Last night I realized that on the PC I can use FM7.1 to convert them to PDF, then use Acrobat 6.0 to convert those files to Word. My big problem is how to convert my "legacy" (i.e., still unpublished research) FrameMaker files to IDCS2.
Word allows me to use the same files on both platforms - although many features of the program drive me crazy. At the moment I do most of my writing on a PC, using XP and MS Word, and then output stuff on the Mac. The problems with FrameMaker for me are that (a) it won't support Unicode, (b) footnote treatment is terrible (no breaks across pages, placement of notes well after the reference number), and (c) they've orphaned the Mac product. Instead, I have used it on the Mac for years and years because (a) it is rock-solid in the treatment of the mixed text that I use (mostly English, lots of diacritically marked Sanskrit words, plus Chinese and Japanese characters for names and terms) (b) I love the auto-numbering and cross-referencing features and (c) the printed and PDF output is great.
My uses may be close to unique, since I have not been a long-time FrameMaker user because of its structured document capabilities. I would be very interested in your experience, since I have made (or am making) this switch.
0 kommentar(er)
